This page shows how to create an External Load Balancer.
When creating a service, you have the option of automatically creating a cloud network load balancer. This provides an externally-accessible IP address that sends traffic to the correct port on your cluster nodes provided your cluster runs in a supported environment and is configured with the correct cloud load balancer provider package.
For information on provisioning and using an Ingress resource that can give services externally-reachable URLs, load balance the traffic, terminate SSL etc., please check the Ingress documentation.
You need to have a Kubernetes cluster, and the kubectl command-line tool must be configured to communicate with your cluster. If you do not already have a cluster, you can create one by using Minikube, or you can use one of these Kubernetes playgrounds:
To check the version, enter kubectl version
.
To create an external load balancer, add the following line to your service configuration file:
"type": "LoadBalancer"
Your configuration file might look like:
{
"kind": "Service",
"apiVersion": "v1",
"metadata": {
"name": "example-service"
},
"spec": {
"ports": [{
"port": 8765,
"targetPort": 9376
}],
"selector": {
"app": "example"
},
"type": "LoadBalancer"
}
}
You can alternatively create the service with the kubectl expose
command and
its --type=LoadBalancer
flag:
kubectl expose rc example --port=8765 --target-port=9376 \
--name=example-service --type=LoadBalancer
This command creates a new service using the same selectors as the referenced
resource (in the case of the example above, a replication controller named
example
).
For more information, including optional flags, refer to the
kubectl expose
reference.
You can find the IP address created for your service by getting the service
information through kubectl
:
kubectl describe services example-service
which should produce output like this:
Name: example-service
Namespace: default
Labels: <none>
Annotations: <none>
Selector: app=example
Type: LoadBalancer
IP: 10.67.252.103
LoadBalancer Ingress: 123.45.678.9
Port: <unnamed> 80/TCP
NodePort: <unnamed> 32445/TCP
Endpoints: 10.64.0.4:80,10.64.1.5:80,10.64.2.4:80
Session Affinity: None
Events: <none>
The IP address is listed next to LoadBalancer Ingress
.
Due to the implementation of this feature, the source IP seen in the target container will not be the original source IP of the client. To enable preservation of the client IP, the following fields can be configured in the service spec (supported in GCE/Google Kubernetes Engine environments):
service.spec.externalTrafficPolicy
- denotes if this Service desires to route
external traffic to node-local or cluster-wide endpoints. There are two available
options: “Cluster” (default) and “Local”. “Cluster” obscures the client source
IP and may cause a second hop to another node, but should have good overall
load-spreading. “Local” preserves the client source IP and avoids a second hop
for LoadBalancer and NodePort type services, but risks potentially imbalanced
traffic spreading.service.spec.healthCheckNodePort
- specifies the healthcheck nodePort
(numeric port number) for the service. If not specified, healthCheckNodePort is
created by the service API backend with the allocated nodePort. It will use the
user-specified nodePort value if specified by the client. It only has an
effect when type is set to “LoadBalancer” and externalTrafficPolicy is set
to “Local”.This feature can be activated by setting externalTrafficPolicy
to “Local” in the
Service Configuration file.
{
"kind": "Service",
"apiVersion": "v1",
"metadata": {
"name": "example-service"
},
"spec": {
"ports": [{
"port": 8765,
"targetPort": 9376
}],
"selector": {
"app": "example"
},
"type": "LoadBalancer",
"externalTrafficPolicy": "Local"
}
}
k8s version | Feature support |
---|---|
1.7+ | Supports the full API fields |
1.5 - 1.6 | Supports Beta Annotations |
<1.5 | Unsupported |
Below you could find the deprecated Beta annotations used to enable this feature prior to its stable version. Newer Kubernetes versions may stop supporting these after v1.7. Please update existing applications to use the fields directly.
service.beta.kubernetes.io/external-traffic
annotation <-> service.spec.externalTrafficPolicy
fieldservice.beta.kubernetes.io/healthcheck-nodeport
annotation <-> service.spec.healthCheckNodePort
fieldservice.beta.kubernetes.io/external-traffic
annotation has a different set of values
compared to the service.spec.externalTrafficPolicy
field. The values match as follows:
Note that this feature is not currently implemented for all cloudproviders/environments.
Known issues:
It is important to note that the datapath for this functionality is provided by a load balancer external to the Kubernetes cluster.
When the service type is set to LoadBalancer
, Kubernetes provides functionality equivalent to type=<ClusterIP>
to pods within the cluster and extends it by programming the (external to Kubernetes) load balancer with entries for the Kubernetes pods. The Kubernetes service controller automates the creation of the external load balancer, health checks (if needed), firewall rules (if needed) and retrieves the external IP allocated by the cloud provider and populates it in the service object.
GCE/AWS load balancers do not provide weights for their target pools. This was not an issue with the old LB kube-proxy rules which would correctly balance across all endpoints.
With the new functionality, the external traffic will not be equally load balanced across pods, but rather equally balanced at the node level (because GCE/AWS and other external LB implementations do not have the ability for specifying the weight per node, they balance equally across all target nodes, disregarding the number of pods on each node).
We can, however, state that for NumServicePods « NumNodes or NumServicePods » NumNodes, a fairly close-to-equal distribution will be seen, even without weights.
Once the external load balancers provide weights, this functionality can be added to the LB programming path. Future Work: No support for weights is provided for the 1.4 release, but may be added at a future date
Internal pod to pod traffic should behave similar to ClusterIP services, with equal probability across all pods.
Create an Issue Edit this Page